10 Jan 2007
Just one more thing about the iPhone, and then I promise I'll shut up about it for at least a couple of minutes.
I noticed something while watching the photos video on the website for the phone functions. When you tap the button to send a photo by email, the following things happen: the background disappears and the photo reduces in size slightly (a visual clue to the fact that the photo is literally being downsized for sending by email, I think1) but stays visible, then the email page appears and zooms forwards as the photograph drops into place. It struck me that most other companies would do the same transition as follows: the whole screen goes black for a fraction of a second, and the email page with photograph in place is rendered (from top to bottom, probably).
So why am I twittering on about this tiny and seemingly insignificant thing, that could be dismissed as pointless eye-candy? It seems to me that it shows just how carefully they've thought about how we do these tasks naturally in real life, and the way that your brain, your hands and your eyes deal with the information. You've got a photograph (printed on paper) in your hand that you want to post to your Aunty Flo, so you take it over to a sheet of writing paper, on which you glue the photograph, writing your message above it. The object you're dealing with (the photograph) is in your sight the whole time, and thing you're adding it to (the paper) visually appears to increase in size beneath it until the two are in the same plane.
The iPhone version of the virtual world doesn't make you think, 'what was I doing?', or make you disconnect and reconnect to the task. I think that's impressive.
1 Quite clever in itself -- why put up a bit of text saying "Resizing photo..." when you can show it happening? ↑
2
If you haven't read John Maeda's "Laws of Simplicity" yet, I think you'd really enjoy it, based on this post and your design philosophy for Tracks.by Luke Melia @ 10/01/2007 8:20 pm • Permalink
3
CISCO Systems are a bit upset, it would appear that they registered the name "iPhone" several years ago - there will be tears before bed time.....by Jonathan Briggs @ 11/01/2007 9:54 am • Permalink
4
Lionel: Yes, that's trueby bsag @ 11/01/2007 5:31 pm • Permalink
5
Well, I am no longer interested: ""In an interview with the New York Times, Steve Jobs confirms reports that the recently-announced iPhone will not allow third party applications to be installed. According to Jobs, 'These are devices that need to work, and you can't do that if you load any software on them.' Via Slashdot6
Milan: Yes, that's a bit disappointing, but not entirely surprising. They might change their minds eventually, and at least allow third party widget development. But even if they don't the iPhone has a great browser, so you could built wonderful, custom-built Ajaxy apps for it.by bsag @ 14/01/2007 8:04 pm • Permalink
1
As for the resizing image message (or lack thereof) another advantage is that it's one less thing to translate for the French / German / Welsh / Tagalog versions.by Lionel @ 10/01/2007 8:02 pm • Permalink