30 Mar 2005
(Read Part 1)
When I'm not fuming over the pathetic mess that we in the UK are forced to call a railway system, I really like train travel. So I was excited to be taking several train journeys while in Japan — one of them on the bullet train or shinkansen.
As I mentioned before, PD had lived in Japan for a while. Without her, I think that GS and I would have been a bit baffled by the railway system. It isn't that it's particularly complicated (there's a helpful guide here), but there are enough quirks in the system that novice travellers would be confused. For a start, buying the tickets at Osaka wasn't straightforward as the ticket machines had few labels in English. PD did really well with resurrecting her Japanese, and we all ended up with tickets to the right places. What GS and I would also not have known is that there are different categories of train which correspond roughly to different speeds of service. Not surprisingly, the faster services come at a premium, and you have to pay a supplement to the fare. There are also supplemental fees for seat reservations, but we opted for unreserved seats on the medium speed of service.
Then there's the queueing system. This is actually an excellent idea; each train lines up precisely with certain spots on the platform when it arrives, which correspond to the doors for each carriage. There are signs on the platform and painted lines which show you where to queue for each carriage. Since we were in unreserved seating, we had to find the unreserved carriage stop, and since we don't smoke, we also wanted the non-smoking unreserved carriage. That done, we stopped faffing around and getting in people's way and waited for our train.
The frequency of the service is excellent, with trains turning up every ten minutes or so; more often on busier lines. Sure enough, just before the appointed time, the sleek, pointy-nosed train glided up. There's plenty of legroom in the seats, and despite the slightly dated upholstery, it's very comfortable. As we left the station, I looked at my watch and commented with mock horror that we were a minute late leaving. In fact, it turned out that my watch was a minute fast, and we left precisely on time.
It's almost incomprehensible for someone used to the British rail system, but the average delay for the shinkansen over a year is less than one minute. Unbelievably, that also includes times when the service has been stopped for an hour or more because of a typhoon or earthquake. It's like another world.
We were also very impressed by the ticket collectors and refreshment trolley operators. When they had finished in a carriage, they stopped at the door, thanked everyone for their co-operation, and bowed politely. It's hard not to have a rather superficial impression of a place after only a week, but I definitely got the feeling that people in the service industry genuinely like their jobs and feel pride in what they do. Again, hard to imagine that happening in the UK.
As their name suggests, the bullet trains are fast. Really fast. Even though we weren't on the fastest service, we whipped along at a furious rate but the ride was very smooth and stable. My only complaint is that the journey was over too soon.
On Friday, I'll have to get back on to a Central Trains service again, and the comparison with the Japanese rail system is not going to be favourable.
2
15 minutes late? Hah. Virgin don't actually qualify a train as late until it's at least 30 minutes delayed, and normally 45. And they don't pay any compensation unless (if memory serves) it's at least 2 hours later than it should've been. And that's a "Government Standard". Excuse me while I piss myself laughing. In six months of going Manchester to Reading every weekend, exactly one train train was on time. Going back was slightly better - I think I figured out that about one in three was on-time (or close enough for spitting) when travelling back up on a Monday morning. Sunday night travel, however, was invariably tits-up and late.3
And they wonder why most people in england prefer to drive...4
A couple of years ago, Japan had a day where 'all trains were on time' meaning that every passenger train arrived and departed within 15 seconds of when I was supposed to. Its not my fault I know this - I used to work in rail section of my company...5
From my brief visit to Stockholm I can say the trains there are similar to Japan in their time keeping. After getting used to England's train service I almost had a heart attack when I realised the timetables weren't a rough estimate : ) It was the same with the boats travelling out to the archipelago. It was quite funny (in a mean spirited way) to see the (invariably) British tourists turn up at the dock one minute after the departure time wondering why there wasn't a boat waiting for them.6
It is a bit of a puzzle why we can't seem to get a decent train service going. France, the Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland, as well as Japan, all seem to be able to do it without too much trouble.7
the governments in those countries all put decent amounts of money and time into their rail systems - keeping the tracks decent and stuff. the govt here complains that people don't use public transport enough, but they refuse to improve basic standards and put money into improving the rail infrastructure. not that i'm a train enthusiast or anything. but i am v jealous that you've been on the shinkansen8
Just made my first visit to Japan. Took the Rail/Bus system everyday to commute to and from work and tour on the weekends. Well, I got to say, they do one fine job!! Trains on time, clean, secure and fast. Detroit, the city from which I'm from, well oK, not Detroit, but the subburbs, close enough, you have got a little catching up to do. With the rising cost of petro, and the escalating cost of owning/operating a vehicle, we need to start developing a mass transit system, and I dont mean an extension of that pathetic piece of $@*#% you call the people mover. The "Coleman Train" which goes from nowhere to nowhere. I'm talking about a system that will connect the Burbs with Detroit and extend to Ann Arbor, Lansing, Jackson, and yes, even the North....Mt. Pleasent and Traverse City. What a concept..... -----by MKC @ 01/06/2006 1:07 pm • Permalink
1
Less than a minute a year? Less...than a minute...a year? As someone else who has experienced UK train travel too much that just blows my mind. I knew it was good but not that good. I'm used to train companies declaring "Yay! 80% of our trains are running on time...errr this week"----- gpshewan: The average delay per year is less than a minute, not the total, but yes---it is incredible. Train operators here don't even consider that a train **is** late until it's about---what---15 minutes late? And as I said, the delays include unavoidable long ones of an hour or so during typhoons, so the majority of delays must be of the order of a few seconds for the average to still be less than a minute. Phew.by bsag @ 30/03/2005 9:04 pm • Permalink