30 May 2005
I watched a fantastic documentary called Alchemists of Sound about the BBC Radiophonic Workshop. I've long admired the Radiophonic Workshop — both for the quality of their output, and because they seemed to embody the same kind of 'high innovation on a shoestring budget' ethos that also typified the British rocket industry of the same period. I'm in awe of the skill and patience required to record and manipulate sounds on to analogue tape, and then cut, splice, speed up, slow down and re-record those loops until you have something that sounds completely unearthly.
The workshop had some — for the time — expensive and ground-breaking kit, but they also made a lot of stuff themselves from old tobacco tins and components scavenged from skips, as well as testing lots of everyday objects for their potential to generate interesting sounds. One thing that made me laugh out loud for ages afterwards was an archive shot that wasn't even commented upon in the commentary. It showed a box with lots of interesting looking knobs, dials and buttons. Attached to one knob was a handwritten label in stern capitals which read, "DO NOT FIDDLE WITH".
Another reason for admiring the Radiophonic Workshop is that several women played a very influential part — something that was unfortunately unusual for a technical field at that time. The most famous of the workshop women was Delia Derbyshire, who was a mathematician and musician, and was turned away from Decca Records in 1959 because they said that they didn't employ women in the recording studios. Their loss. Delia's most famous piece was the Doctor Who theme, which she arranged from Ron Grainer's composition. Every time I hear her arrangement, I'm astounded by how modern it sounds. Plenty of people have tried to 'update' it, but I think that the best you can hope for is not to mess it up too much. Perhaps it should have a "DO NOT FIDDLE WITH" label on it. Her version sounds grittier and weirder than any of the subsequent synthesised arrangements, and I like the tiny variations in timing that you get with edited tape loops. Sometimes synthesisers are just too regular, and it makes the music seem cold. I also didn't know before I watched the programme that the bass line in the Doctor Who theme was produced by plucking a string; not a musical string, but just an ordinary bit of string.
They featured some of Delia's other compositions on the programme, including the slightly creepy 'Ziw-zih Ziw-zih oo-oo-oo' and the utterly haunting and evocative Blue Veils and Golden Sands. I must try to get hold of some of her recordings on vinyl.
One of the people interviewed made a very interesting point about technology. He said that in the early days, the imagination of the composers outstripped what the technology was capable of. People had a clear idea what they wanted to achieve, and would work away until they got as close as possible to their vision. However, as technology improved, the possibilities outstripped the imagination of the composers. So now, there's a tendency for composers working with electronics to try out buttons randomly until they find something they like, which isn't the same thing at all.
2
Jonathon Briggs: I think that a certain amount of happy randomness and chance can sometimes spark off inspiration, but you definitely need the talent to follow it through. I'm thinking of things like the story John Adams tells about the dream which inspired 'Harmonielehre', in which a giant supertanker shot from the water of San Francisco bay [like a rocket](http://www.earbox.com/sub-html/comp-details/harmleh-de.html). I think that the 'throwaway society' is worldwide, unfortunately. It's almost impossible to find household goods like toasters or kettles which can be repaired, and most modern cars are difficult to repair yourself because of the electronic engine management systems. When I had my old Hillman Imp, finding the problem when something went wrong was pretty easy: you just noted which component you saw bouncing down the road in the rear view mirror! I've never thought about a link between having different number bases and mental versatility, but I guess it's possible. Glad you enjoyed Red Shoes. I think it's slightly more variable than The Sensual World (for example), but the high points are still a million times better than most other artists (I won't even mention ring tones).3
Hey bsag, can I hijack your Comments box for a serious scientific question? My own little readership leans mainly to the Arts - well, mainly lean, anyway - so may not come up with the answer to Today's Question. Whereas your erudite, techno team (Ok, 'nuff flattery) will doubtless have the response immediately to hand? So - how come planets are basically round? I'm just keen to know, y'know... I thang yew.4
Mr D, Smallest surface area, surface tension must be the same all over, dynamically stable, all points on surface equidistant from centre of gravity (planets are in a molten state when first formed) - just my opinion as a non-scientist.by Jonathan Briggs @ 01/06/2005 10:07 pm • Permalink
5
Thanks, JB It sort of fits my own guess - but that leads me to another conundrum, which I'll pose later on my own blog. * hands bsag the rent money *6
re DO NOT FIDDLE WITH: A story about 'Magic'7
Mr. D.: What Jonathon Briggs said8
Old stuff here -----
1
Right with the last paragraph - it ranks along with art schools that tell you to "Throw away your pencils" and Poetry software to which you add random words and which then write your "Poetry" for you. Artistic runes for the soundbite generation! Would you consider throwing M&Ms; on the floor and calling it a mosaic? E-Bayed a copy of Red Shoes, 'd forgotten how good Kate Bush could be - my wife never liked her, I don't think it had anything to do with her music!----- The Japanese Goverment, after extensive research, pronounced that, in the 20th Century, 50% of the worlds most useful inventions were British, and that no other single nation came anywhere close to achieving that level of creativity. I rather suspect that this ability is rapidly being lost as the amazing ability of the British to "Make do and mend", and he ability to think a way round a problem because you had no money to spend on fixing it, has been swamped by the advent of "Not worth fixing, throw it away, buy a new one" society. In the last 30 years we have been losing that ability to work in multiple number bases - 12d to the shilling, 240d to the £, 20/- to the £, 16oz to the lb, etc., etc. Now youngsters can barely count in 10's and the breadth of thought implicit in the "Old weights and measures" has narrowed that focus which hasn't been excised by txting and computer games, and to cap it all, the charts are being topped by a mobile phone ringtone!by Jonathan Briggs @ 31/05/2005 5:05 pm • Permalink