Why WordPress?
I said earlier that I would write about why Iâve made the move from Movabletype to WordPress. I want to say right at the start that my decision really isnât a criticism of Movabletype. It has served me extremely well for more than a year, and has made my life immeasurably easier. But one thing Iâve found as Iâve been keeping this blog is that your needs (and skills) change as time goes on, so that you canât necessarily forsee what you will need in a blogging tool a year or two years down the line. The thing that prompted my itchy feet in the end was the problem of rebuilding the site.
Movabletype (MT) and WordPress (WP) have a lot of similarities (indeed, many of the new features Iâve included in my new design could have been accomplished with MT), but one fundamental difference: MT produces static web pages, and WP produces dynamic ones. This difference is an important one; every time the content of the page needs to change in a static system (which can happen quite frequently with a weblog with comments, trackbacks and so on), the entire page needs to be rebuilt. If you have monthly and category archives, those pages need to be rebuilt too. Rebuilding is pretty speedy when you have a small number of posts, but it gets slower as time goes on and you accumulate more content. However, with a dynamic system, the changes are made the instant someone reloads the page.
I tried a number of different blogging tools, but eventually settled on WP after setting up a test blog and playing with it for a while. Itâs a great systemâextremely easy to install and configure, and yet with a lot of scope for advanced customization. Better yet, itâs Open Source, so anyone can contribute hacks and fixes for it. Itâs also free as in beer. Not that I begrudge paying for software, especially something that I depend on every day. I donated to MT when I started using it, and I consider that money very well spent.
